Score:

Samsung Galaxy S III review

By on July 2, 2012
submit to reddit

Does the S III have what it takes to become the defining Android phone for the year?

Good: Fastest phone we've tested, Good set of features, Excellent battery life
Bad: Construction quality not the best, Camera is strictly ok
Price: AED 2495
* The price is the Suggested Retail Price at the time of review. Please call a retailer to confirm the latest price for this product.

Samsung’s Galaxy line of Android phones can arguably be credited for bringing Android to the masses and amongst the many models that Samsung released under the Galaxy brand, the Galaxy S II holds a very special position not just for Samsung but for a lot of it’s users as well. It defined Samsung as the best Android device manufacturer and won countless awards for being the best device of last year. Today we look at the follow up to the Galaxy S II, unsurprisingly titled the Galaxy S III and see if Samsung has managed to create a true successor to it’s phenomenal device.

Packaging

Our review unit of the Samsung Galaxy S III arrived in a very plain looking blue box with Samsung Galaxy S III etched on top. For someone who doesn’t know much about Samrtphones, they’d think that the Galaxy S III is a most ordinary device based on the packaging. The unit is available in two colors- blue and white and I recieved the former version, I think white looks nicer. Other than the main phone, Samsung bundles the customary headphones and USB cable with charger plug along with a quickstart guide and warranty information.

Build quality & design

Thin is certainly in and the Galaxy S III shows us that with it’s incredibly slim porfile. Measuring 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm and weighing just 130g, Samsung maximizes the screen space by equipping the S III with a huge 4.8” screen in a size that is not too much bigger than other devices with smaller screens while at the same time being thinner and lighter. The following picture compares the S III to the Galaxy Nexus, also a device manufactured by Samsung.

Unlike the iPhone 4S or the HTC One X, the Samsung Galaxy S III doesn’t exude that premium fit and finish and instead of glass or carbon-fiber, you end up with a very plastic finish that tries to give off a metallic effect. That’s not to say that the design is bad and honestly, I think you’ll end up with lesser damage and heartache were you to drop the S III instead of the other devices, but nevertheless, when everyone else presenting premium finishes on their devices, the S III stands out like a sore thumb. This is especially felt when you remove the back cover and notice how thin and flimsy it feels.

Around the device, you have volume buttons on the left side and a power/lock button on right. A 3.5mm jack sits on top while the bottom has a micro USB connector. The back cover comes off and reveals spaces for a microSD card as well as a micro SIM card. The back side also houses the speaker phone and the main 8MP camera while the front has an additional camera and a notification LED above the screen and a home button below it along with two touch buttons for back and menu.

The Galaxy Nexus, showed Google’s concept for an ICS device and it’s interesting to see none of the top tier manufacturers following Google’s footsteps in ditching hard buttons with onscreen ones. Samsung has chosen to use the back and menu buttons alongside the home button and honestly, I’m not sure if this is a good idea as it creates inconsistencies and to some extent, fragmentation. To give you an example, the menu button is now onscreen for most ICS based Android devices but you don’t see that button on the Samsung Galaxy S III. Also the back button is located to the right of the home button but my personal preference would have been on the left side as that’s where you generally see a back button on your browser or an onscreen button.

Screen, Specs and Benchmarks

The 4.8” screen size of the Samsung Galaxy S III is the second biggest sized screen I’ve seen in a phone (Galaxy Note, also by Samsung, takes that honor.) Sadly it’s a step back in technology and unlike the stunning Super AMOLED Plus screen that we saw on the Galaxy Note, the Galaxy S III uses the pentile based non plus version of the screen that is not as vibrant.

According to Samsung’s spokesperson, it’s because those blue sub-pixels that are absent on Super AMOLED displays degrade faster than their red and green allies. With the aim of keeping its phones healthily glowing for at least 18 months, it made the decision to go with the Pentile formation. That’s not to say that it’s a bad screen but it’s not one of the key selling points for Samsung as it has traditionally been and displays like the SLCD one found on the HTC One X look as impressive, or possibly even a tad bit better than the S III. I also found the screen very faded when using it outdoors under the UAE sunlight and had to crank the brightness to full be read the screen properly.

If speed is what you’re looking for, you won’t find a faster phone than the Samsung Galaxy S III. Based on the Exynos 4212 chipset with a Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 based CPU and the Mali-400MP GPU, the Galaxy S III smokes the competition when it comes to benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S III HTC One X Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Price AED AED AED
Size 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm 134.4 x 69.9 x 8.9 mm 135.5 x 67.9 x 8.9 mm
Weight 133g 130g 145g
Screen Size 4.8″ 4.7″ 4.65″
Resolution 720 x 1280 (306 ppi) Super AMOLED 720 x 1280 (312 ppi) 720 x 1280 (216 ppi)
CPU Exynos 4212 Quad Core 1.4Ghz Nvidia Tegra 3 Quad Core 1.5GHz TI OMAP 4460 Dual Core 1.2GHz
RAM 1GB 1GB 1GB
Storage 16/32/64GB 32GB 16GB
Connectivity HSDPA, 21 Mbps
Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n
Bluetooth 4.0
HSDPA, 21 Mbps
Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n
Bluetooth 4.0
HSDPA, 21 Mbps
Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n
Bluetooth 3.0
OS Android 4.0 Android 4.0 Android 4.1 (4.1 soon)
Added UI TouchWiz 4.0 Sense UI 4.0 Stock Android
Front Camera 1.9MP / 720p 1.3 MP / 720p 1.3 MP / 720p
Back Camera 8MP / 1080p 8MP / 1080p @ 24fps 5MP / 1080p
Battery Lithium Ion 2100 mAh Lithium Pro 1800mAh Lithium Ion 1750mAh

The Samsung Galaxy S III completed the SunSpider benchmark in 1505ms which is the fastest we’ve seen on any phone and by a large margin. The One X completed that test in 2004ms. Even in other benchmarks such as GLBenchmark and Quadrant, the Galaxy S III smoked the competition.

UI and Apps

Like most of the other top-tier phone manufacturers, Samsung adds their own UI on top of Android’s stock UI and I can see how this is has become more of a necessity for a manufacturer to differentiate their Android based phone from other competitors. Samsung calls their UI TouchWiz and on it’s 4th iteration, it is a lot less obtrusive than some of the previous versions which is a good thing as I wasn’t the biggest fan of TouchWiz.

Samsung brings quite a set of features with the Galaxy S III, some which are interesting while others will probably not be used much. The one I liked most is Smart Stay which, using the front camera on the device, tracks to see if you are looking at the screen or not and if you are, it prevents the screen from shutting off- a complain that I have with almost every other Smartphone.

Another new feature and this is purely aimed at Siri is S-Voice that tries to make your phone more usable using your voice. With my tests, it worked well at times but failed miserably quite a few times as well. Also borrowed from iPhone is double-tap to top which takes you to the top of a list. One more semi-useful feature is Social Tagging where the camera tried to recognize faces from a picture you take from the camera. I say semi-useful because it wouldn’t always recognize faces in a picture.

Other less-usable features on the Galaxy S III include Direct Call which calls the person you are texting when you raise the phone to your ear, Smart Alert that vibrates the phone after you have picked it from not using it for a while to let you know if there are any pending notifications and Touch Beam which shares media with another Galaxy Phone using NFC.

Camera

The Camera on the Galaxy S III takes decent pictures but nothing outstanding in my tests. If the subject is still and there is plenty of light, you will get some really good pictures however, picturing my daughter in a play area always resulted in a blurry shot.Also low-light and night time pictures appear a bit grainy. I’m not sure if I’ve been spoiled by the Nokia 808 PureView or not but I feel that the camera on the Galaxy S III is not as good as the iPhone 4S or the HTC One X.

Conclusion

Wrapping things off, Samsung has done good by providing a pretty high capacity battery with the Galaxy S III. The 2100 mAh battery certainly has more capacity than the 1800mAh one found in HTC’s One X or even Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus that comes equipped with 1750mAh. This definitely makes the Galaxy S III last longer than the two devices I mentioned and I was frequently getting almost two days worth of usage. The only other Android based phone that has managed to do so is the Motorola RAZR Max with it’s massive 3300mAh battery that comes at the expense of making that phone a bit heavy at 145g.

So is the Samsung Galaxy S III the best Android handset currently available? The answer to that depends of your preferences. If you want something that is super fast then there is no denying that the S III smokes everything else. There are also many little features like Smart Stay that you will not find on other devices and TouchWiz as a UI has certainly come a long way.

However, there are three areas where the Galaxy S III loses out to the HTC One X- the screen, the camera and the construction quality. So, again, it really really depends on what you’re looking for when choosing an Android phone. Also keep in mind that Google has announced Jelly Bean (Android 4.1) which will be available on the Galaxy Nexus this month- probably much before any other device gets it and the Galaxy Nexus can be picked for almost a thousand Dirhams less than the Galaxy S III at the moment.

In short, while the Galaxy S III is an excellent phone and better than all other Android phones at certain levels, it is not the definite Android device to get that the Galaxy S II proved to be a year back.


About

Abbas Jaffar Ali is the founder of tbreak.com and a blogger, geek and self-declared tech pundit who can't stop talking about technology. Find him on twitter as @ajaffarali

Comments
  • Irfan

    Good review and excellent phone

    • dhin

      Some day I have one of them.,,

  • Mike

    A bit late, there are million reviews of it now. Who does the editing and checking of these articles? Benchmark section ends abruptly after mention of Quadrant! Not enough description of S Voice or that it, unlike iOS5 Siri, can launch apps and submit Facebook status. Good review but short and not well proof-read!

  • Bill Brasky

    216 PPI for Nexus is wrong. I think you meant 316. :)

  • Antonio

    stop naming that shitty iphone… apple products are way overstimated. It’s stuff for dorks,

  • Pingback: Samsung Galaxy S III review | t-break: Tech @ Its Fastest | BlackOps

  • James Prabhakar

    I bought Samsung Galaxy s3 in Dubai on 2nd June. I have been using this for the last 3 months without any issues. I like this Androd device more than the Iphone 4S that i tried before.

  • Just Me

    Actually the review is garbage, coming off as written by someone who has no, or little, clue what they’re talking about. There’s no meat to it, just crap about the exterior finish and packaging which is all “fluff” when someone is looking to pretend to know what they’re talking about. The benchmarks are one base tool that anyone can get their hands on with almost zero analysis. No depth on features. I probably spent more time writing that your review sucks than you did researching the product you’re pretending to know something about…and probably farmed off someone else’s website. Thanks for the waste of my time.

Most Read
Most Commented
Competitions
Win two Toshiba AT200 tablets

This festive season Toshiba has 2 tablets to giveaway.

Win an MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 Motherboard

Thanks to MSI we have an great AMD FM2 motherboard to giveaway.

Win a Nokia Asha 311

Thanks to Nokia we have a great entry-level smartphone to giveaway.