Antivirus test 2011

By on December 27, 2010
submit to reddit

How secure is your PC?

As such, all of my tests were performed emulating what an average user’s machine would be, taking things from there on. First off, the system specs:

MSI GE600 laptop

  • Intel Core i5-430M @ 2.26GHz (2.53GHz with TurboBoost) 2 cores, 4 threads
  • 4GB DDR3
  • ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
  • Intel HM55 motherboard

The laptop comes with a Western Digital 500GB 5,400rpm hard drive with Windows 7 Home Premium and a lot of MSI software pre-installed. To keep things simple I replaced the hard drive with an Intel X-25M 80GB (G2) SSD, installing Windows 7 Ultimate on it and installing all the Important Windows Updates and necessary drivers for the laptop to function properly. In addition to these, I have also installed World of Warcraft: Cataclysm as well as 3D Mark 11 and Mozilla Firefox beta 4. Combined, there was just over 30GB left out of 80GB on the Intel SSD.

So with the hardware out of the way, let’s take a look at what exactly I’ll be looking at in these antivirus software.


The initial contact the end user will have after downloading/ inserting the CD is how easy or complicated it is to install the antivirus software. Almost all of the antivirus software I tested had the option for an “Easy/Complete” install while also providing a “Custom” install option. Even while choosing a Custom install, I didn’t face any complicated choices in any software.


The first look at the antivirus software will be how user-friendly it is. All the antivirus software tested allowed completely in-depth access to various features and settings with scheduled runs, custom scans, enabling/disabling of features and sub-systems as well as actions to be taken upon detection.


These can be anything from a slow scan or update to other random technical issues that may cause the PC or the antivirus software itself to stop functioning properly to anything that seems non-user friendly or frustrating.


This is the actual test itself where I measure how long it takes the antivirus to run a complete system scan on default settings once it has been updated. I will also be looking at subsequent scan times if they vary significantly from the first system scan. In addition to measuring time taken to scan the number of files on the laptop, I have also looked at whether the antivirus scales with multiple threads or not.

Finally I went to certain web pages which are known to be infected, leaving your PC with a Trojan or a virus. These websites were taken from Malware Domain List. Note that many of these domains were being taken off by the host as time progressed, so I was not able to test the same websites with all the antivirus software; although I did try to keep it consistent with Trojan infected pages.

« Previous Page Next Page »


From auditing to editing, I now test and analyze the latest gadgets and games instead of the latest financial statements. Both jobs are equally intense and rewarding. When I'm not burning up hardware in the name of science, you'll find me nuking in DOTA 2 or engineering in TF2.

  • Alon Fital

    Wondering why you didn’t test MSE

    i have switched from kaspersky KIS to it about a year ago when my license expired and haven’t looked back.

  • Fausto Chavez

    no avg and no mse….fail article.

  • Pingback: News for December 27th 2010

  • Larry

    I agree. How can you not include the best av out there in your test? MSE.

  • Smeagol107

    personally I like Vipre-very fast and non intrusive

  • Pingback: Antivirus 2011 Roundup

  • Tommy

    I’m sorry but this article tests the AVs too briefly and superficially to make assumptions.
    It’s known that Avira Free has a higher virus detection rates than most (if not all) the freebies, and that’s pretty important when scanning for malware.
    I’ve already cleaned countless machines that had Avast! installed. Avira or MSE detected what Avast! hadn’t.

    • Abbas Jaffar Ali

      Thanks for your insightful comment Tommy- is there a website or a file that we can download from somewhere that we can use for future testing of anti-virus applications?

      • Tommy

        Try on eicar, although is pretty outdated. You should try with an infected machine, clone its HD and test with various AVs.

        Also, check this site:

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Antivirus test 2011 - --

  • SohanG

    I have to agree with most of the post right now. IMHO Avira is a far better AV than avast, I’ve been using it for a while now and I’ve been protected by it countless times.

  • Wkarls

    I use Vipre period

  • Taimoor Hafeez

    Not using MSE was a result of a series of some seriously unfortunate events, it’ll be there next time for sure.

  • Dimatheone

    I use a regular at ESET. Their software is very easy. While in office we use Norton, I know a website that offers up to 60% off for security software. Over the past two years I buy from them.

Most Read
Most Commented
Win two Toshiba AT200 tablets

This festive season Toshiba has 2 tablets to giveaway.

Win an MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 Motherboard

Thanks to MSI we have an great AMD FM2 motherboard to giveaway.

Win a Nokia Asha 311

Thanks to Nokia we have a great entry-level smartphone to giveaway.