Nuclear Dawn Review [UPDATED]

By on September 30, 2011

A mashup that doesn’t pay off.

Good: daring attempt to mix two very different genres
Bad: commander can make or break your team very quickly; limited maps; no proper tutorials
Price: AED
* The price is the Suggested Retail Price at the time of review. Please call a retailer to confirm the latest price for this product.
7.0/10

Share this Article





   

First Impressions
My reaction is

There have been a splutter of games in recent years that have tried to marry particular genres together in the attempt to create something new and spectacular. Sadly, these hybrids often miss the mark completely and result in fizzing out into the digital ether. Nuclear Dawn is an upcoming game that attempts to fuse the FPS and RTS genres together to create a supposedly memorable game. Unfortunately it doesn’t do either genre any good and ends up being a rather haphazard game to play.

Having played this in Beta, the story isn’t much to go on – you choose to side with either the Consortium or the Empire (no, not the Empire from Star Wars) and are thrown into a post-apocalyptic battleground to survive. You choose from one of four classes; Assault, Stealth, Support, and Exo, which are all fairly standard to any FPS game. Where the game differs from the traditional FPS is with the inclusion of the Commander role.

The Commander is picked at random from a list of players that have ‘applied’ to be the team’s Commander. If chosen, their game view switches to a traditional top-down RTS view, where they can reinforce their team’s base, call in units, and build defensive structures. You can also unlock technologies to improve your team’s attack and defense, and the game is over when the enemy bunker has been destroyed. Both Commander and team have to work together in each round, as the team members need to venture out and capture the many supply points scattered around the map.

While on paper it may sound wonderful, the gameplay is much different. The FPS side of the game feels a bit left out compared to the current slew of FPS games available. The shooting seems a bit awkward at times, and in the few matches that I played I was almost immediately overpowered by annoying snipers or ‘run and gun’ assault troops, which really made the experience frustrating, even for a beta. The RTS element had good intentions, but again ends up being a rather lonely affair while your team mates run around and put bullets into everything that moves. It’s also a bit unfair the Exo class has stupidly powerful weaponry available, and though the move slowly they can easily rip a team to shreds.

It’s easy to see why the game doesn’t feel quite there yet – it’s built around the Source engine and feels just like an overzealous mod. The graphics aren’t impressive and the environments feature the same bleak post-apocalypse garb we’ve seen all too many times before. I applaud the developers for trying to make this work, but I honestly don’t see many players spending too much of their time trying it out.

Update: This review was originally published on September 20th and was based on beta code that was sent to us for a review. Following on comments on the review and a patch that was released before the game went public, I have replayed the game to evaluate how it has improved from the beta.

The first noticeable change is that the graphics are much smoother now, and gunplay doesn’t judder as it did before. The class system still could use a bit of tweaking, as players that wielded machine guns and rocket launchers could often only be taken down by surprise or by a sniper. Tutorials are now also available, though these are just videos that can be accessed from the main menu and cause the game’s background music to break abruptly while the video plays. At the heart of the game your Commander is still king, and clearly holds most of the power in the game. But while the game seems to make it a point that the Commander and teammates need to communicate to win, this was rarely the case in most of the matches I played. In one match the Commander was just shouting out “They’re flanking us from the East!” which made no sense as there’s no way to tell what direction that is. In another match our Commander decided to take a little mini-vacation, so the game glaringly pointed out ‘YOUR TEAM IS WITHOUT A COMMANDER’. In yet another match, the enemy Commander decided that building rocket launchers at every turn was a great way to shred us to pieces, so that battle was swiftly lost. But on the occasions where you have a good Commander in your midst, you can rely on their strategic thinking to help you out of a few tight spots. The game will provide you with a decent amount of entertainment, but if you end up having a crap Commander, there’s no shame in Mutiny.


About

A former IT & Marketing Manager turned full time Editor, Nick enjoys hurling fireballs and tinkering with the latest gadgets. Follow him on Twitter as @theregos

More Reviews
Comments
  • Hollow_Eve

    Don’t review betas. They are Beta’s for a reason…

  • Liquid

    I can’t say whether the final game deserves the score you awarded it or not. But I can say NO game should be reviewed on its beta; it’s in beta for a reason.

    The only thing this review has shown me is how amateurish this site, its staff and reviews are. For a “Senior Games Journalist”, you show little to no discretion or professionalism.

    And before you ask…no, I am no way associated with the Nuclear Dawn team.

  • Edub

    Can we get a new review? This is absolutely terrible for several reasons.

    First of all, this is a review for a game that was in BETA. A week before release. Couldn’t Nick have waited a WEEK until the retail version came out? The retail version has had a LOT of changes made in the past week.  “The same post-apocalyptic garb” is a red flag. It only sounds like Nick played the Downtown map and that’s about it.

    Secondly, this review is ridiculously short. A couple of paragraphs? That’s it? I get no sense that the writer actually played much of the game.

    And finally, calling this game an overzealous mod without explaining is ridiculous.  Dino D-Day feels like a mod (despite great Dinosaur models).  I’ve played many Source mods and Nuclear Dawn definitely warrants it’s commercial release as a Source engine game.

    Re-write the review please. It isn’t fair for the readers and the makers of the game.

  • Cmbasnett

    This is a pretty bad review, makes a bunch of unsubstantiated statements about game-play, whines that other people were killing him, ignores that the commander should be in contact with the rest of the team, it is far from a lonely affair.  And you reviewed a beta?  An unfair review that lacks any critical thought.

  • Derp

    Fantastic review! Amazing, bloody brilliant. Nailed this one on the head. Spot on. Ingenious. Unparalleled. In fact, I’m only going to read reviews of betas now. Really, I mean it. It’s faster. So is only playing for an hour. I like fast. Everyone likes fast. Who doesn’t like fast?

  • Jhanson

    I like how the reviewer complains about the game feeling like an overzealous mod while sounding like your average hasty-tasty PC Gamer trying to review a title.

    In Beta.

    The average 12-year old Gamespot user writes better reviews.


Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/sites/t/tbreak.com/public_html/megamers/wp-content/themes/meg2010/sidebar_category.php on line 7
Most Read
Most Commented